Literature Review On Information Governance

Literature review on Information Governance

Your paper will include the following sections. Do not use any format other than an attached Microsoft Word file. Use a standard font style and size. A page in the body of your paper (other than the Cover, TOC, and References) is equivalent to approximately 250 words. In total, the body of your paper can range from a minimum of eight pages (2,000 words) . The match percentage cannot exceed 20% (highly suggested to paraphrase sources).

Cover (1 page):

Include the names of those who participated in the project

Table of Contents (1 pages):

Use a Microsoft Enabled Table of Contents feature.

Background of the Problem (1 pages):

Describe the problem and elaborate on any previous attempts to examine that issue.

Research Questions (1 pages):

For the identified problem, discuss the research questions that were posed.

Methodology(-ies) and Design(s) (2 pages):

Discuss the methodology(-ies) (e.g., quantitative, qualitative) and design(s) (e.g., case study, survey) the researchers used. Describe some of the chosen populations.

Data Analysis (2 pages):

You will conduct a literature review (scholarly sources only) on Information Governance. You will determine how researchers have attempted to examine that issue by collecting data (you are not collecting data; just reporting on prior research).

As you read the literature, it will become apparent that there are multiple issues. Select one issue that stands out in the literature and address it. You must end up with at least five scholarly sources on which you will base your paper.

Discuss some of the findings.

Conclusions (1 pages):

Discuss some of the conclusions.

Professional Application (1 pages):

Discuss the relevance of the research to your own profession and/or career.

References (1 pages):

Include at least five scholarly references in APA format (all these must also be cited throughout your paper).

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis StatementRaises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter ArgumentProvides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.